Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting. 1 We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles. Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully.1

Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics. 2 The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive. Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss.2

In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema. 3 Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense. Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable.3

We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles. 4 A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats. Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting.4

The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive. 5 Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully. Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics.5

Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense. 6 Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss. In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema.6

A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats. 7 Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable. We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles.7

Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully. 8 Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting. The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive.8

Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss. 9 Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics. Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense.9

Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable. 10 In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema. A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats.10

Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting. 11 We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles. Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully.11

Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics. 12 The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive. Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss.12

In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema. 13 Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense. Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable.13

We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles. 14 A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats. Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting.14

The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive. 15 Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully. Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics.15

Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense. 16 Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss. In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema.16

A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats. 17 Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable. We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles.17

Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully. 18 Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting. The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive.18

Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss. 19 Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics. Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense.19

Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable. 20 In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema. A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats.20

Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting. 21 We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles. Tables with spanning headers require the serializer to preserve colspan and rowspan faithfully.21

Each element carries explicit semantics, so a downstream renderer can make correct layout decisions without heuristics. 22 The reference list is where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible defects if the renderer is not defensive. Mathematical content must survive the round trip from MathML to the rendered output without namespace loss.22

In practice, the hardest cases are the ones where real-world documents deviate from the idealized schema. 1 Footnotes interact with pagination in ways that are easy to get wrong when content is dense. Cross-references should resolve to stable anchors so that both print and screen output remain navigable.1

We observed that affiliation handling, in particular, varies widely between publishers and even between articles. 2 A two-column layout stresses the flow algorithm far more than a single column, especially around floats. Structured markup separates content from presentation, which is the precondition for reliable automated typesetting.2